Mercedes Is Asking For A 'Reality Check'

Michael Accardi
by Michael Accardi

Mercedes-Benz CEO Ola Källenius spoke in strong words about the European Union’s planned ban on new combustion vehicles from 2035.

Key Points

  • Mercedes-Benz CEO Ola Källenius warns the EU’s 2035 ban on CO₂-emitting vehicles could cause a market collapse if implemented without changes.
  • Calls for incentives and lower charging costs to encourage EV adoption instead of an outright ban.
  • Urges a technology-neutral approach to decarbonization to protect both the environment and Europe’s auto industry.

The executive is warning that Europe's policy could severely damage the car industry in the old world if it goes ahead unchanged. In an interview with Germany’s Handelsblatt newspaper, Källenius said the proposal—currently due for review in the second half of 2025—needs a “reality check” to avoid what he described as “heading at full speed against a wall.”


While supporters see the ban as fundamental to Europe’s climate goals, critics—and automakers—argue that it risks kneecapping an already strained automotive sector facing weak demand, rapidly increasing prices, huge capital outflows, slowing EV sales, and fierce competition from China.

Källenius, who also serves as president of the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA), suggested that the market could “collapse” if the regulation is implemented without adjustments, as buyers could pull their consumption forward and rush to purchase gasoline and diesel models before the deadline, and then really only subsequently participate in the used market.


Instead of an outright ban, Källenius is asking for subsidization policies that make electric vehicles more attractive to consumers, including tax incentives and reduced charging costs—which is basically what we already have. "Of course, we have to decarbonise, but it has to be done in a technology-neutral way. We must not lose sight of our economy," Kaellenius said.


Become an AutoGuide insider. Get the latest from the automotive world first by subscribing to our newsletter here.


Michael Accardi
Michael Accardi

An experienced automotive storyteller and accomplished photographer known for engaging and insightful content. Michael also brings a wealth of technical knowledge—he was part of the Ford GT program at Multimatic, oversaw a fleet of Audi TCR race cars, ziptied Lamborghini Super Trofeo cars back together, been over the wall during the Rolex 24, and worked in the intense world of IndyCar.

More by Michael Accardi

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Dav82321048 Dav82321048 on Aug 14, 2025

    "I can tactilely find it in the same place it always is in my 'E" Amen!


    On a funny note. I used to drive a '68 Mustang, and I usually wore the separate shoulder belt while on the highway. That led to a problem. The '68 belt's don't have tensioners, so for them to work they have to be comfortably snug, which means if you're a short guy, you can no longer reach anything on the dash.


    On a long drive you might start out warm, but as the day goes on you might want some heat in the car, but yah can't have it without pulling over and undoing the belts to reach the controls.


    Solved the problem by taking my left shoe off and running the heater controls on the left of the dash with my toes. Worked in the dark too!


  • Mat138509251 Mat138509251 on Aug 14, 2025

    Mercedes pretty much lost the plot after 2018. I would not buy any car past that year. We will be keeping our 2017 GLC43 and 2014 ML63 for as long as we can. They are both fantastic cars. New cars have no soul.

    • Ninja250 Ninja250 on Aug 28, 2025

      I agree! We have a 2003 Mercedes CLK320 Cabriolet. a 2013 C300 4matic, and a 2016 E350 4Matic in the family fleet. All of them have V6 engines that get at least 26 mpg around town and 30-32 mpg on the highway. They are more than adequate for comfortable city missions and long vacation drives. Today's similar models all have 4 cylinder engines with turbocharging. Sorry, but I'm not 16 anymore and prefer the refined power delivery of a V6 or V8. I also don't want to be blinded by the totally unneeded dash-wide TV screen that is in every new car today. In fact, for most of our long trips, I prefer the 2003 model that has almost no annoying tech. Sad that all car companies seem to be unable to listen to their established customers and think they need to make their vehicles an electronic tour de force. No matter, I'm 75 now and can easily keep our current Mercedes collection running until I'm gone or have to hang up my keys from old age. Guess Mercedes doesn't care to get in "one last sale", but I might remind them that the people enamored of their current designs won't be able to afford them in sustainable quantities for another 20 to 30 years. No wonder MB execs are worried about low priced competition from China!


Next