Government Says GM Is Gunning To Get Mercedes Banned From America

Michael Accardi
by Michael Accardi

Earlier today, we brought you news that lawmakers approved the Connected Vehicle Security Act, a sweeping bill designed to ban cars linked to foreign adversaries on national security grounds. The bill contains a specific equity clause that would instantly ban Mercedes-Benz from American showrooms.


The ownership clause dictates that any automaker with more than 15 percent total ownership held by Chinese entities faces a complete sales ban. Mercedes-Benz currently operates with roughly 20 percent passive Chinese investment equity, split between state-owned BAIC Group and Geely founder Li Shufu. As currently drafted, the premium German brand would be categorized alongside Chinese state firms and barred from the U.S.


Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz alleged that General Motors is pushing hard for the equity requirements to get Mercedes out of the market in an effort to make Cadillac more competitive in the luxury vehicle space.

During the committee hearing, Senator Cruz pointed a finger straight at Detroit. Cruz went on record saying GM has been aggressively lobbying for the 15 percent ownership cap specifically to force Mercedes-Benz out of the United States.


According to Reuters, Cruz added that while national security concerns are legit, "we would never consider" banning Mercedes-Benz sales outright, indicating the Germans would have until the end of the decade to adjust their equity structure and could apply for waiver exemptions.


General Motors did not directly deny the allegations. In a statement, the automaker said “the legislation isn’t about any individual automaker. GM supports policies that protect and strengthen American manufacturing and the global competitiveness of U.S. automakers.”

The ownership cap isn't the only provision GM is accused of orchestrating to strain rivals. Another clause in the bill would introduce strict domestic battery supply mandates, which, according to Cruz, would force automakers to buy batteries from GM. This could inject up to $5,000 in extra manufacturing costs per vehicle.


Rivian pushed hard for an amendment to revise the battery management software requirements, but the effort ultimately failed.


It's no surprise GM is going on the offensive—the American automaker is already fairly well insulated from the upcoming regulations. GM has spent the last year aggressively unraveling its overseas manufacturing ties, including permanently ending Chinese assembly of the Buick Envision at the conclusion of the 2026 model year.

Michael Accardi
Michael Accardi

An experienced automotive storyteller and accomplished photographer known for engaging and insightful content. Michael also brings a wealth of technical knowledge—he was part of the Ford GT program at Multimatic, oversaw a fleet of Audi TCR race cars, ziptied Lamborghini Super Trofeo cars back together, went over the wall during the Rolex 24, and wrenched in the intense IndyCar paddock.

More by Michael Accardi

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 8 comments
  • Tom81964906 Tom81964906 on Jul 26, 2026

    If GM wants to be more competitive in the luxury vehicle market, they should start by building better vehicles.

  • Ninja250 Ninja250 on Jul 26, 2026

    Let's see, so far I've put gas, oil, brake pads, and tires in our three Mercedes sedans over their entire course of ownership. Right now, our Chevy truck is in the shop for its annual $1000+ of repairs for parts that have failed, fallen off, or rusted through. If GM's meddling gets Mercedes Benz banned, I will work a lot harder to communicate my low opinion of their junk products to a far wider audience!

    • Rai81970678 Rai81970678 on Jul 26, 2026

      Some context would be helpful. Not sure how old your vehicles are, but I have a 2009 Dodge Ram that I bought new and by this time would be expected to have rounds of investment for parts that wear out, whereas our main transportation that is my wife's car gets traded out every 6-7 years. Not saying that Mercedes doesn't build great cars, but I would be shocked if the routine maintenance charges on Mercedes isn't near four figures a year based on the long term updates I follow on these cars in Motor Trend and Road & Track. Usually trucks get beat on and Mercedes are coddled. Not a GM fan as my last purchases have been 2012 Town and Country replaced with 2019 Pacifica, a 2011 Grand Cherokee replaced by 2022 Grand Cherokee and the afore mentioned 2009 Dodge Ram. My Ram has worked a lot harder than any of those other vehicles, sometimes outside of it's intended parameters of operation, so perspective matters in regards to how to interpret the above statement. If the Chevy is an air hauler most of the time and only a few years old, the statement may be valid.

Next