5 Things We Hate About The 2027 Chrysler Pacficia

AutoGuide.com Staff
by AutoGuide.com Staff

The Chrysler Pacifica continues to be one of the most practical, comfortable family haulers on the market. For the 2027 model year, Chrysler refreshed its flagship minivan with an updated front fascia, new lighting, and a price reduction across most of the lineup.


However, despite its strengths in cabin space and everyday versatility, a few lingering drawbacks keep this classic people-mover from absolute perfection.


Here are 5 things we hate about the 2027 Chrysler Pacifica:

1. Chrysler Dropped the Fuel-Efficient Hybrid

Perhaps the biggest disappointment for the 2027 model year is that Chrysler officially killed off the Pacifica Plug-In Hybrid. Citing low customer take rates, the plug-in variant is no longer an option. That leaves buyers with only the conventional 3.6-liter Pentastar V6, meaning anyone shopping specifically for 30+ MPG efficiency or zero-emission school runs will have to cross-shop the Toyota Sienna or Kia Carnival Hybrid instead.

2. Disappointing Gas-Only Fuel Economy

Without a hybrid in the stable, the Pacifica’s fuel economy drops to the middle or back of the pack. The front-wheel-drive version manages an EPA-estimated 22 MPG combined (19 MPG city / 28 MPG highway), while opting for all-wheel drive drags those numbers down to 20 MPG combined (17 MPG city / 25 MPG highway). In a segment where electrified rivals easily top 30 to 36 MPG combined, the Pacifica will definitely cost you more at the pump.

3. Inconsistent Interior Material and Fit-and-Finish Quality

While top-tier trims like the Pinnacle feature plush Nappa leather and upmarket styling, lower and middle trims suffer from noticeable cost-cutting. Base models miss out on the soft-touch dashboard surfaces found elsewhere in the lineup, and certain cabin trim pieces lack the tight, seamless fit-and-finish precision seen in competitors from Honda and Toyota.

4. Top-Spec Pinnacle Trim Sacrifices Second-Row Stow 'n Go

The Pacifica’s flagship feature has long been its patented second-row Stow 'n Go seating, which allows the middle seats to fold completely flat into floor bins. However, if you step up to the range-topping Pinnacle trim (which tops out over $58,000), you lose this feature. To make room for ultra-plush, extra-thick captain's chairs and a fixed center console, the second-row seats are removable rather than fold-flat—removing the van's biggest party trick.

5. Aging Cabin Architecture Beneath the Skin

While the 2027 exterior refresh brings a modern illuminated wing badge and "piano key" LED lighting signatures, the underlying interior layout is largely unchanged and showing its age. Chrysler has been using this core cabin architecture for a decade. While physical buttons and easy-to-use knobs are a welcome sight, the overall dash design and gear selector layout lack the fresh, contemporary feel of newer entrants in the segment.


Become an AutoGuide insider. Get the latest from the automotive world first by subscribing to our newsletterhere.

AutoGuide.com Staff
AutoGuide.com Staff

More by AutoGuide.com Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Fred Fred on Oct 17, 2026

    Dropping the hybrid is not a thing to hate. Stellantis couldn't get it right, they are still under a no-fix recall. Park outside, away from vehicles and structures, as they tend to burn to the ground without warning.


    The other thing to hate is the "enhanced" 3.6 V6 that eats camhafts, roller followers, EGR coolers, oil filter housings, head gaskets and warps engine blocks.

    • Rai81970678 Rai81970678 on Oct 17, 2026

      I have had 2 Chrysler minivans since 2012, with the first being a Town and Country and the current is a 2019 Pacifica. First traded at around 120K, no major issues, especially from the drivetrain. Current is at 120K, owned for over 7.5 yrs, would drive anywhere. I also have a 2022 Grand Cherokee with the Pentastar with 70K and no issues. I bought extended warranties I have never used. The actual failure rate of these engines is 1-3%, as I have been tracking forums in regards to the issues. If you are smarter than the dealers and change the oil at 7500 miles or less rather than the 10K recommended and make sure to not over-torque the cap on the oil filter housing you will most likely never have an issue. You do realize there are millions of these engines out there. They were used in Rams, Chargers, Challengers, Journeys, 300's, 200's, Grand Caravans, Promasters, Grand Cherokees, etc. On craigslist I see these things with over 200K miles all the time. Not sure where your hate is coming from but is unfounded. Might want to focus on the class action lawsuit for the Honda 3.5 motors, GM's V8s, and Ford's ecoboost motors. If the 3.6 was such a bad motor, I would expect the same against Chrysler.


Next